Validation rules

UBL-SR-40 — UBL rule

The buyer trading name (BT-45) appears more than once — the customer party may carry only one PartyName/Name.

Rule
UBL-SR-40 — official EN 16931 / XRechnung rule
Severity
error
Detected by
tier 3 — KoSIT validator (authoritative)
Reachability
Only reachable when validating your own XML — normbill-generated documents cannot trigger it

The normbill invoice model has no separate buyer trading name; generated XML never contains a buyer cac:PartyName.

How to fix it

Keep a single cac:PartyName/cbc:Name under the customer party.

UBL-SR-40 auf Deutsch — was bedeutet der Fehler?

Der KoSIT-Validator lehnt die Rechnung ab, weil der Handelsname des Käufers (BT-45) mehrfach vorkommt — nur ein PartyName/Name ist bei der Käuferpartei erlaubt.

So beheben Sie den Fehler

Behalten Sie genau einen cac:PartyName/cbc:Name bei der Käuferpartei.

Related rules

  • UBL-SR-39 — The project reference (BT-11) appears more than once — only one cac:ProjectReference with one cbc:ID is…
  • UBL-SR-42 — The supplier party carries more than two cac:PartyTaxScheme elements — at most two are allowed: the VAT…
  • UBL-SR-37 — An item price discount (BT-147) appears more than once — only one cac:Price/cac:AllowanceCharge with one…
  • UBL-SR-43 — A schemeID attribute is set on an AdditionalDocumentReference/cbc:ID that is not an invoiced-object…
  • UBL-SR-36 — An invoice line carries more than one invoicing period (BG-26) — only one cac:InvoicePeriod per line is…
  • UBL-SR-44 — The document carries more than one distinct cbc:PaymentID value — the payment reference (BT-83) must be…

Official sources

Every 422 from the API lists the rule id, the path in your request JSON, a plain-language message and a suggested fix — see the docs overview for the report format.

Or try it live: drop any XRechnung XML on the free validator — same KoSIT-backed report, no account.

Spotted something?

Bug, missing feature, wrong validation result — tell us. The page you're on is attached automatically; email optional.