Validation rules

UBL-SR-19 — UBL rule

The payee name (BT-59) is invalid: cac:PayeeParty may carry at most one PartyName/Name, and it must differ from the seller name — state a payee only when it is not the seller.

Rule
UBL-SR-19 — official EN 16931 / XRechnung rule
Severity
error
Detected by
tier 3 — KoSIT validator (authoritative)
Reachability
Only reachable when validating your own XML — normbill-generated documents cannot trigger it

The normbill invoice model has no payee party (BG-10); generated XML never contains cac:PayeeParty.

How to fix it

Remove the PayeeParty if the seller is paid directly, or keep exactly one payee name that differs from the seller's.

UBL-SR-19 auf Deutsch — was bedeutet der Fehler?

Der KoSIT-Validator lehnt die Rechnung ab: cac:PayeeParty darf höchstens einen PartyName/Name tragen, und der Zahlungsempfänger (BT-59) muss sich vom Verkäufer unterscheiden — ein Payee ist nur anzugeben, wenn er nicht der Verkäufer ist.

So beheben Sie den Fehler

Entfernen Sie die PayeeParty, wenn der Verkäufer selbst die Zahlung erhält — oder geben Sie genau einen abweichenden Empfängernamen an.

Related rules

  • UBL-SR-18 — The buyer VAT identifier (BT-48) appears more than once — only one PartyTaxScheme with TaxScheme/ID 'VAT'…
  • UBL-SR-20 — The payee identifier (BT-60) is invalid: cac:PayeeParty may carry at most one PartyIdentification/ID (SEPA…
  • UBL-SR-17 — The buyer legal registration identifier (BT-47) appears more than once — only one PartyLegalEntity/CompanyID…
  • UBL-SR-21 — The payee legal registration identifier (BT-61) is invalid: at most one PartyLegalEntity/CompanyID is…
  • UBL-SR-16 — The buyer identifier (BT-46) appears more than once — the customer party may carry only one…
  • UBL-SR-22 — The tax representative name (BT-62) appears more than once — cac:TaxRepresentativeParty may carry only one…

Official sources

Every 422 from the API lists the rule id, the path in your request JSON, a plain-language message and a suggested fix — see the docs overview for the report format.

Or try it live: drop any XRechnung XML on the free validator — same KoSIT-backed report, no account.

Spotted something?

Bug, missing feature, wrong validation result — tell us. The page you're on is attached automatically; email optional.