Validation rules

BR-DE-25-a — XRechnung rule

Payment means is a SEPA direct debit (code 59) but direct-debit information (BG-19) is missing.

Rule
BR-DE-25-a — official EN 16931 / XRechnung rule
Severity
error
Business term
BT-81 — Payment means code
Field in your JSON
invoice.payment.means_code

How to fix it

Set invoice.payment.mandate_id, creditor_id, and debited_iban, or use means_code 58 with an IBAN.

BR-DE-25-a auf Deutsch — was bedeutet der Fehler?

Als Zahlungsart ist eine SEPA-Lastschrift (Code 59) angegeben, aber Lastschriftangaben (BG-19) fehlen.

So beheben Sie den Fehler

Setzen Sie invoice.payment.mandate_id, creditor_id und debited_iban — oder verwenden Sie means_code 58 mit einer IBAN.

Related rules

  • BR-DE-1 — Payment instructions (BG-16) are missing. XRechnung requires them.
  • NB-PAYMENT-MEANS-UNSUPPORTED — Card-payment means codes (48/54/55) need card information (BG-18) that normbill cannot express yet — KoSIT…
  • BR-CL-16 — The payment means code (BT-81) is not a UNTDID 4461 code.
  • BR-49 — Payment instructions (BG-16) are present but the payment means type code (BT-81) is missing.
  • BR-DE-24-a — The payment means is a card payment (code 48, 54 or 55), so card information (BG-18) is required.
  • UBL-SR-27 — A cac:PaymentMeans carries more than one cbc:PaymentMeansCode (BT-81) — each payment means states exactly…

Official sources

Every 422 from the API lists the rule id, the path in your request JSON, a plain-language message and a suggested fix — see the docs overview for the report format.

Or try it live: drop any XRechnung XML on the free validator — same KoSIT-backed report, no account.

Spotted something?

Bug, missing feature, wrong validation result — tell us. The page you're on is attached automatically; email optional.