Validation rules

BR-CO-18 — EN 16931 rule

The invoice has no VAT breakdown (BG-23) — at least one is required.

Rule
BR-CO-18 — official EN 16931 / XRechnung rule
Severity
error
Detected by
tier 3 — KoSIT validator (authoritative)
Reachability
Only reachable when validating your own XML — normbill-generated documents cannot trigger it

The engine always emits one VAT breakdown per category/rate group used by the lines.

How to fix it

Add cac:TaxTotal with at least one cac:TaxSubtotal (taxable amount, tax amount, category).

BR-CO-18 auf Deutsch — was bedeutet der Fehler?

Die Rechnung enthält keine Umsatzsteueraufschlüsselung (BG-23) — mindestens eine ist Pflicht.

So beheben Sie den Fehler

Ergänzen Sie cac:TaxTotal mit mindestens einem cac:TaxSubtotal (Basisbetrag, Steuerbetrag, Kategorie).

Related rules

  • BR-CO-17 — A VAT breakdown's tax amount (BT-117) does not equal its taxable amount (BT-116) multiplied by the category…
  • BR-CO-19 — An invoicing period (BG-14) is present but carries neither a start date (BT-73) nor an end date (BT-74).
  • BR-CO-16 — The amount due (BT-115) must equal the invoice total with VAT (BT-112) minus the paid amount (BT-113), plus…
  • BR-CO-20 — An invoice line period (BG-26) is present but carries neither a start date (BT-134) nor an end date (BT-135).
  • BR-CO-15 — Supplied totals.gross does not equal net + tax.
  • BR-CO-21 — A document-level allowance (BG-20) carries neither a reason text (BT-97) nor a reason code (BT-98) — at…

Official sources

Every 422 from the API lists the rule id, the path in your request JSON, a plain-language message and a suggested fix — see the docs overview for the report format.

Or try it live: drop any XRechnung XML on the free validator — same KoSIT-backed report, no account.

Spotted something?

Bug, missing feature, wrong validation result — tell us. The page you're on is attached automatically; email optional.