Validation rules

BR-CO-05

The document-level allowance reason code (BT-98) and reason text (BT-97) should describe the same type of allowance.

Rule
BR-CO-05official EN 16931 / XRechnung rule
Severity
error
Detected by
tier 3 — KoSIT validator (authoritative)
Reachability
Not expressible through the normbill invoice model — documented for completeness

The pinned Schematron implements this as an always-true assertion (semantic agreement between code and free text cannot be machine-checked), so the validator never reports it in practice.

How to fix it

Align the allowance's reason and reason_code so they describe the same thing.

BR-CO-05 auf Deutsch — was bedeutet der Fehler?

Der Code des Nachlassgrundes (BT-98) und der Grundtext (BT-97) sollen denselben Nachlasstyp beschreiben. Die amtliche Schematron-Implementierung prüft dies faktisch nicht (Always-true-Assertion).

So beheben Sie den Fehler

Bringen Sie reason und reason_code des Nachlasses inhaltlich in Übereinstimmung.

Official sources

Every 422 from the API lists the rule id, the path in your request JSON, a plain-language message and a suggested fix — see the docs overview for the report format.

Or try it live: drop any XRechnung XML on the free validator — same KoSIT-backed report, no account.

Spotted something?

Bug, missing feature, wrong validation result — tell us. The page you're on is attached automatically; email optional.